MENU

NYPRR Archive
Category Archive

Waiting for Courts to Amend Code

Current Issue, NYLER Archive, NYPRR Archive, UncategorizedComments Off on Waiting for Courts to Amend Code

By Roy Simon [Originally published in NYPRR January 2001]   The New York State Bar Association recently forwarded to the Appellate Divisions a proposed new Disciplinary Rule, DR 1-107, to govern contractual relationships between lawyers and non-legal professionals, including so-called “side-by-side” arrangements and “strategic alliances.” At...

Read More

Growing Trend Against Motions to Disqualify

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Growing Trend Against Motions to Disqualify

By Roy Simon [Originally published in NYPRR January 2001]   In the prior installments of this article, I considered the reluctance of the district courts to disqualify lawyers on conflicts issues, even when discipline for a breach of the ethics rules may...

Ethics 2000 Commission Issues Timely Report

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Ethics 2000 Commission Issues Timely Report

By Steven C. Crane [Originally published in NYPRR January 2001]   The American Bar Association produced the Canons of Professional Ethics in 1908 and the Model Code of Professional Responsibility in 1969. It introduced the Model Rules of Professional...

Case Digests: “Santalucia v. Sebright Transportation,” “Baker v. Dorfman,” “Britt v. Legal Aid Society”

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Case Digests: “Santalucia v. Sebright Transportation,” “Baker v. Dorfman,” “Britt v. Legal Aid Society”

By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR January 2001]   Santalucia v. Sebright Transportation, Inc. Contingent-Fee cases are property of dissolving firm. Absent contrary agreement, firm gets value of claim at dissolution, not quantum meruit. The...

Working Without Fees: Failure to Heed Rules in Domestic Relations Matters

Current Issue, NYLER Archive, NYPRR Archive, UncategorizedComments Off on Working Without Fees: Failure to Heed Rules in Domestic Relations Matters

By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR December 2000]   Two decisions by New York County Supreme Court judges imposed draconian penalties on lawyers who failed to follow the rules controlling retainer agreements, client billing, arbitration...

Prospective Client Perjury: A Lawyer’s Dilemma

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Prospective Client Perjury: A Lawyer’s Dilemma

By Hal R. Lieberman [Originally published in NYPRR December 2000]   One of the most confounding ethical dilemmas facing a criminal defense lawyer is the prospect that her client intends to testify falsely. Although the prohibition against knowingly...

NYSBA Delegates Approve MacCrate MDP Proposals

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on NYSBA Delegates Approve MacCrate MDP Proposals

By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR December 2000]   New York took a significant first step towards the implementation of the MacCrate Committee’s MDP proposals on Nov. 4, 2000, when the NYSBA House of Delegates approved two new DRs — DR...

Growing Trend Against Motions to Disqualify: Part 2

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Growing Trend Against Motions to Disqualify: Part 2

By Roy Simon [Originally published in NYPRR December 2000]   In the first installment of this article, [see, NYPRR Nov. 2000], I asked whether there is a growing trend in the Southern District against granting motions to disqualify opposing counsel. I...

Growing Trend Against Motions to Disqualify: Part 1

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Growing Trend Against Motions to Disqualify: Part 1

By Roy Simon [Originally published in NYPRR November 2000]   Is there a growing trend against granting motions to disqualify opposing counsel? Three cases may not make a trend, but three cases decided in the Southern District this year suggest that...

Revisiting N.Y. Rule on Threats of Criminal Prosecution

NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Revisiting N.Y. Rule on Threats of Criminal Prosecution

By Sarah Diane McShea [Originally published in NYPRR November 2000]   Disciplinary Rule 7-105(a) forbids lawyers from threatening criminal prosecution “solely to obtain an advantage in a civil matter.” However, the rule has been interpreted in New...