MENU

Posts Tagged ‘Lazar Emanuel’

  • Federal Courts Construe Rule 11 Sanctions Motions

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Federal Courts Construe Rule 11 Sanctions Motions

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR October 2002]   Two decisions by judges in the New York federal courts construing Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure warrant scrutiny. Rule 11(c) permits federal trial judges to impose...

  • City Bar Reverses Stand on Adverse Client Contact

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on City Bar Reverses Stand on Adverse Client Contact

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR October 2002]   Reversing a position taken more than 10 years ago [New York City Formal Op. 1991–92], the Ethics Committee of the City Bar has decided that a lawyer may assist a client to communicate...

  • Supreme Court Strikes Limits on Speech by Judicial Candidates

    Current Issue, NYLER Archive, NYPRR Archive, UncategorizedComments Off on Supreme Court Strikes Limits on Speech by Judicial Candidates

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR September 2002]   In a decision with wide impact on future judicial electoral campaigns, the Supreme Court has struck down as a violation of free speech all rules limiting the expression of views by...

  • Pecuniary Damages Rule Applied to Malpractice in Criminal Cases

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Pecuniary Damages Rule Applied to Malpractice in Criminal Cases

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR September 2002]   In Wolkstein v. Morgenstern [713 N.Y.S.2d 171 (App. Div. 1st Dept. 2000)], the First Department promulgated a simple and clear rule in all civil cases: Except in cases of conduct “so...

  • Lawyers in Social Security Cases May Recover Contingent Fees

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Lawyers in Social Security Cases May Recover Contingent Fees

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR September 2002]   Traditionally, lawyers representing clients on social security claims have relied on contingent fee agreements providing for fees equal to 25 percent of past-due benefits recovered. In an...

  • Felonies & Serious Crimes in Lawyer Discipline

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Felonies & Serious Crimes in Lawyer Discipline

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR August 2002]   The rules governing the commission of crimes by New York lawyers and the resulting scope of discipline by the courts require research in several places, including the New York Code of...

  • Disposing of Escrow Funds Belonging to Missing Client

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Disposing of Escrow Funds Belonging to Missing Client

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR August 2002]   What are a lawyer’s obligations in either of the following circumstances? Example One: A law firm recovered a judgment in behalf of its client. The judgment provided for payment in annual...

  • ABA Commission Reports on Multijurisdictional Practice

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on ABA Commission Reports on Multijurisdictional Practice

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR July 2002]   The ABA’s Commission on Multijurisdictional Practice has issued its final recommendations for the control of multijurisdictional practice by lawyers. The Commission defines...

  • Firm Disqualified for Conflict Between Clients

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on Firm Disqualified for Conflict Between Clients

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR May 2002]   In R.M. Buck Construction Corporation v. Village of Sherbourne [#90788 (April 4, 2002)], the Appellate Division, Third Department, ordered the disqualification of Melvin & Melvin LLP, a...

  • NYSBA Reverses Stand on Contingent Post-Divorce Collection Fees

    NYPRR ArchiveComments Off on NYSBA Reverses Stand on Contingent Post-Divorce Collection Fees

    By Lazar Emanuel [Originally published in NYPRR April 2002]   After 25 years, the State Bar has decided that under the present rules, a New York lawyer may not “enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect a contingent fee in a post-divorce action...